The Greatness of Peace - The Purpose of Light
Publisher's Foreword
One of the motifs highlighted in the sichos to follow is that
although the Chanukah lights shine in the darkness of the night
of exile, in the present age, they are kindled within our homes.
A parallel to this exists with regard to the light of Chassidus.
Chassidus has the power to illuminate the entire world, preparing
it to shine with the light of the Redemption. But - particularly,
from a Chabad point of view - firstly, that light must shine
within ourselves, our homes, and our community.
The flow is inside out.
As we provide examples of how the Rebbe's teachings have added
depth, satisfaction, and purpose to our lives, giving us a
foretaste of the Redemption, we will spark others to emulate this
pattern.
May the study of the Rebbe's teachings empower us to successfully
confront the spiritual challenges which we face. And may our
dedication to the mission with which he charged us draw down
overtly apparent Divine good and blessing, including the ultimate
blessing, the coming of the Redemption, and the fulfillment of
the prophecy (Yeshayahu 26:19), "And those who repose in the dust
will arise and sing."
Sichos In English
20 Kislev, 5755
The Greatness of Peace
At the conclusion of his discussion of the laws of Chanukah,
the Rambam writes: [1]
If [a person has the means to perform only one of two mitzvos,]
lighting a lamp for one's home, [i.e., the Shabbos candles,] or
lighting a Chanukah lamp; or a lamp for one's home or the
sanctification of the day (Kiddush), the lamp for one's home
is granted priority, since it generates peace within the home....
Peace is great. Indeed, the entire Torah was granted in order
to bring about peace in the world.
The question arises:
Why does the Rambam explain the importance of peace in the
portion of the Mishneh Torah dealing with the laws of Chanukah?
Moreover, seemingly, it would have been more appropriate to state
this law in Hilchos Shabbos. Indeed, the law applying to Kiddush
which the Rambam quotes [2] has no connection with the laws of
Chanukah. And stating the law in Hilchos Shabbos would not have
prevented him from adding the conclusion concerning the
importance of peace.
Two Frequencies of Light
This question can be resolved by explaining the difference
between the lamps of the Menorah in the Beis HaMikdash and the
Chanukah lamps.
Among the differences between these two mitzvos are:
- the lamps of the menorah were kindled within the Sanctuary
building, while the Chanukah lamps are kindled: "at the
outside of the entrance to one's house." [3]
- the lamps of the menorah were kindled during the day, while
the Chanukah lamps are kindled "after sunset," [3] with the
intent that they burn into the night.
The lamps of the Menorah were kindled in a place where holiness
was overtly revealed; in the Beis HaMikdash, the concealment of
G-dliness which characterizes our material world was not apparent
at all. Therefore, when the Greeks brought impurity into the Beis
HaMikdash, all of the elements of sacrificial worship carried out
in the Beis HaMikdash, and in particular, the kindling of
Menorah, were nullified.
The Chanukah candles serve a different purpose.
Their intent is to illuminate the surrounding environment and
to brighten the darkness of night, i.e., the exile. Indeed, the
Chanukah lights have the potential to negate the powers of the
forces of evil.
This is alluded to in our Sages' statement [4] that the candles
should burn until "the feet of the Tarmudites depart from the
marketplace." The Hebrew name Tarmud shares the same letters as
the word moredes "rebellious one," and refers to the forces of
evil. [5]
This indicates that the Chanukah lights possess a dimension which
surpasses the lights of the Menorah.
This is also reflected in the Ramban's commentary [6] which
explains that the lights of the Menorah were negated by the
influence of the Greeks who desecrated the holiness of the Beis
HaMikdash The lamps of Chanukah, by contrast, will never be
nullified. They will continue to shine even in exile, in the
times of the greatest darkness.
This parallels the advantage which baalei teshuvah, those who
repent, possesses over the righteous. [7]
The righteous have no connection to evil whatsoever. A baal
teshuvah, by contrast, has tasted evil, but through teshuvah,
he has the power to transform his past. Even transgression which
were performed intentionally can be converted into merits; [8]
the evil itself becomes good.
These concepts are also reflected in the fact that we light
a greater number of candles on Chanukah, eight, than in the Beis
HaMikdash, seven.
These numbers are also of unique significance.
Seven refers to perfection within the context of the natural
order, as reflected in the seven days of the week. This applies
in our material world, and in the Seder HaHishtalshelus, the
chainlike progression of spiritual realms. Therefore, in the Beis
HaMikdash, where G-dliness was revealed, seven lamps were
sufficient, for seven represents the light of the natural order.
When, however, the intent is to illuminate the darkness of exile,
it is necessary to employ a light which transcends the natural
order. And such a light is produced by the eight lamps kindled on
Chanukah. For the number eight reflects a light that is not bound
by any limits. [9]
Fusing Two Thrusts
Baalei teshuvah possess an advantage over the righteous; they
draw down a higher level of light. Nevertheless, the righteous
also possess an advantage over baalei teshuvah; they have nothing
to do with evil. Their Divine service involves only good, and
they are privileged to a far greater revelation of Divine light.
For this reason, the ultimate peak of Divine service involves
the fusion of both these approaches, that of the righteous and
the baalei teshuvah. This will be accomplished with the coming
of Mashiach, who will "motivate the righteous to turn to G-d in
teshuvah. [10]
The fusion of these two approaches is made possible by a light
which transcends both of them, and therefore can bring them both
together.
The fusion of these two paths of service is also reflected in
the Chanukah candles. [11] Their purpose is to illuminate the
night of exile. They are, however, rooted in the lamps of Beis
HaMikdash. For, the Chanukah lamps were instituted to commemorate
the miracle that took place concerning the lights of the Menorah,
and they perpetuate that light.
This concept is also alluded to by the eight Chanukah lamps,
for the number eight is associated with the Era of the
Redemption.
Thus our Sages relate [12] that the harp used in the Beis
HaMikdash had seven strands, and the harp of the Era of the
Redemption will have eight strands.
This refers to the revelation which transcends the natural
order This revelation is, however, encompassed by the influence
of G-d's essence, which reflects the ultimate level of
transcendence.
And this level can fuse together the Divine light which permeates
the natural order (paralleled in the context of our Divine
service, by the devotion of the righteous) and the Divine light
which transcends the natural order (paralleled by the commitment
of baalei teshuvah).
The Connection Between Chanukah And Peace
On this basis, we can understand why the Rambam underscores
the greatness of peace in Hilchos Chanukah. Peace refers to
the establishment of unity between two opposite thrusts. [13]
With regard to opposites, there are several different levels.
With regard to the matter at hand, peace in the home, we are
speaking about establishing unity among all the elements of the
house and their ultimate purpose, the indwelling of the Divine
Presence. For every Jewish home is "a sanctuary in microcosm,"
[14] where the Divine presence rests.
In particular, this refers to the establishment of peace between
a husband and his wife.
(For the term "his home" is also employed to mean "his wife.")
[15] Although a man and a woman have opposite tendencies, they
can complement and assist each other [16]
The kindling of Shabbos candles was instituted to bring about
peace in the home. [17] Similarly, the Chanukah candles are also
intended to bring about peace, indeed, an even higher level of
peace: peace between darkness (the time when the Chanukah candles
are lit) and light, between the natural order and the light that
transcends the natural order.
To explain this in terms of our Divine service:
There are two dimensions of the Chanukah lights:
a) The dimension of teshuvah, i.e., that darkness will be
illuminated, establishing peace between entities that
appreciate their selfhood, and G-d.
b) The fusion of the service of teshuvah with the service of the
righteous, that the light which transcends the natural order
will shine within the natural order.
This is the ultimate intent.
When, however, a person lacks resources, it is apparent that his
first priority must be the establishment of peace in the home,
and not an attempt to illuminate his surrounding environment.
Thus kindling Shabbos candles, and thus establishing peace in
the home is given precedence.
Adapted from Sichos Shabbos Parshas Vayeishev, 5722
The Purpose of Light
There is a difference between the Chanukah lights and other
candles kindled to observe mitzvos.
Indeed, this distinction applies even with regard to the lights
of the Menorah, which are the source for the mitzvah of lighting
Chanukah candles.
All of the other lights associated with mitzvos are merely
intermediaries through which one can reach an intended goal.
The Chanukah candles, by contrast, are not intermediaries; the
light they produce represents their purpose.
To explain:
In general, all of the other lights associated with mitzvos can
be divided into two categories:
- lights kindled for the sake of honor, e.g., lights kindled
in a shul, which enhance the honor of that building. They
are not lit for the sake of their light. And therefore, the
blessing borei meorei ho'eish, recited during the Havdalah
ceremony may not be recited on these candles. [18]
- candles which are kindled for the sake of their light.
For example, the Shabbos candles are kindled to use their
light to bring about peace in the home. Similarly, with
regard to the candles of the Menorah, it is written: [19]
"The candles will shine ," i.e., they were kindled to give
off light.
Similarly, the Chanukah candles were kindled to provide light.
For this reason, it is necessary to clarify [20] that these
lights should not be used for Havdalah, because it is forbidden
to derive any benefit from them. Thus were we allowed to benefit
from them, they could be used for the Havdalah ceremony, for
their purpose is to provide light.
A distinction can, however, be made between the Chanukah
candles and the Shabbos candles and the candles of the Menorah.
The Shabbos candles and the candles of the Menorah were kindled
for a purpose: the Shabbos candles to establish peace in the home
and the candles of the Menorah to serve as "testimony to the
world that the Divine Presence rests within Israel." [21]
With regard to the Chanukah lights, by contrast, their light
serves no other purposes; the purpose is in the light itself.
The Talmud [22] does state that the purpose of the Chanukah
candles is to "publicize the [Chanukah] miracle." This does not,
however, represent their fundamental purpose. Their fundamental
purpose is to shine forth light; incidentally, this light also
publicizes the Chanukah miracle. [23]
This explanation is borne out by the fact that we recite a
blessing over the Chanukah candles even in an instance when
kindling them does not publicize the Chanukah miracle. [24]
This is not true with regard to the Shabbos candles. If they are
lit in a manner in which the purpose of generating peace in the
home is not fulfilled, it is forbidden to recited a blessing upon
them.
For example, when several heads of families kindle their Shabbos
lights in a single candelabrum, the additional candles do not
increase the functional dimension of the light. Therefore, it is
forbidden to recite a blessing on the additional candles. [25]
With regard to the Chanukah candles, the Talmud rules [26] that
a candelabrum with two candleholders may be used by two
individuals. Although the second candle does not cause the
miracle to have been further publicized, the person is considered
to have fulfilled the mitzvah, and should recite a blessing
before doing so.
Similarly, the Talmud states [27] that in a time of danger,
[28] when the Chanukah lights cannot be kindled in a manner that
overtly publicizes the miracle, it is sufficient to light the
candle[s] on a table within one's home, and a blessing should be
recited.
This indicates that the dimension of publicizing the Chanukah
miracle is an incidental element of kindling the Chanukah
candles, and not their fundamental purpose. Their fundamental
purpose is the light which they produce.
A Glimmer of Transcendence
The inner dimension of the above distinction can be described
as follows:
All of the elements of the Chanukah miracle - the decrees of the
Greeks in that age, the self-sacrifice of the Jews which brought
about the miracle, the very miracle itself, and the commemoration
of the miracle as instituted by our Sages, - revolve around one
concept: the Jews' commitment to G-d which transcends the limits
of rational thought.
To explain:
The intent of the decrees issued by the Greek's was "to make
them forget Your Torah." [29] The emphasis is on "Your Torah,"
i.e., the Torah as it is connected with G-d, i.e., the G-dliness
in the Torah which transcends rational thought.
The Greeks did not object to the Jews' studying the wisdom and
logic of the Torah. They, however, desired that the Torah be
studied without the appreciation that it is G-d's Torah.
Similarly, with regard to the observance of the mitzvos, the
Greek's intent was to have the Jews "violate the decrees of
Your will." [29]
The word "decrees" refers to the chukim, the mitzvos whose
rationale transcends the limits of knowledge and which are
observed out of a commitment of kabbalos ol, a desire to fulfill
G-d's will. These were the mitzvos which the Greeks endeavored
to stamp out.
More particularly, the Greeks would have accepted the observance
of the chukim were the motive for this observance to have a base
of logic. They would not have objected had the Jews said: It is
true we do not understand the rationale for the chukim.
Nevertheless, we rely on the fact that He who commanded the
observance of the chukim is the ultimate of knowledge. Thus we
can assume that the chukim also possess a rationale that can be
understood, but that rationale transcends the limits of ordinary
mortal knowledge. [30]
What the Greeks objected to was the Jews' commitment to observe
the chukim because of kabbalas ol, without seeking any rationale.
They opposed the Jews' desire to obey solely because the mitzvos
are G-d's will. [31]
This explanation also enables us to understand why the Greeks
made the oil in the Beis HaMikdash impure, rather than destroying
it, or stealing it.
The laws of ritual purity and impurity are also chukim,
transcending the limits of mortal knowledge.
As the Midrash states: [32] "The Holy One, blessed be He,
declares: 'This is a statute which I have instituted, a decree
which I have ordained You have no permission to violate it.' "
There is no reason in mortal logic why a corpse should impart
ritual impurity, or a mikveh should impart ritual purity. This
is a decree from G-d, which the Jews must observe. Since ritual
impurity is a concept which transcends mortal intellect entirely,
the Greeks strove against it, and "made all the oil in the
Sanctuary impure." [33]
Similarly, the Jewish response to the challenge presented by
the Greeks transcended the limits of mortal intellect.
The Jews fought the Greeks with mesirus nefesh; although the
battle pitted "the weak against the strong," [29] they were
willing to sacrifice their lives for G-d, His Torah, and His
mitzvos And self-sacrifice is by nature beyond the bounds of
commitment inspired by understanding.
Comparable ideas apply with regard to the Chanukah miracle.
By definition, every miracle transcends the limits of knowledge.
In addition, the Chanukah miracle is unique in that it was
wrought: "to show [G-d's] love for the Jewish people," [34]
a love which is not bound by the limits of reason.
Since the miracle of the Chanukah lamps reveals a connection
between the Jews and G-d that transcends all limits, our Sages
ordained that the fundamental celebration of the Chanukah miracle
reflect this bond. Therefore, they ordained that we light
candles, [35] commemorating the miracle which transpired with
the cruse of oil, instead of the military victory (which is
commemorated with prayers of praise and thanksgiving).
This points to the transcendent bond which the Jews share with
G-d. [36] Accordingly, we can appreciate why the light of the
Chanukah candles has a self-contained purpose and is not merely
an intermediary serving another intent. Since they reflect the
bond with G-d's essence, that itself is their purpose; there can
be no other objective for them.
Three Planes of Light
As mentioned above, in general, the purpose of the Shabbos
candles, the candles of the Menorah, and the Chanukah candles is
to produce light.
Our Sages say: [37] "There is no light other than the Torah,
as it is written: [38] 'A mitzvah is a candle, and the Torah,
light.'" Thus the light produced by all these three types of
candles is Torah.
The three types of candles allude to three different types of
light, three different approaches to studying the Torah.
One of the purposes of Torah study is to become knowledgeable
concerning the observance of the mitzvos, knowing what and how
we are required to observe. Through this observance, the Torah
brings peace to the world. [39]
This parallels the Shabbos candle s which are kindled for the
sake of "peace in the home."
Another purpose of Torah study is to connect the Jewish people
with G-d. [40] This parallels the lights of the Menorah which
served as testimony that the Divine Presence rests with the
Jewish people.
The highest level of the study of the Torah is Torah lishmah,
the study of Torah for its own sake, without any other intent.
It is this approach to Torah study which binds a Jew with G-d's
essence. [41] And with regard to G-d's essence - and similarly
with regard to the Torah which is one with G-d's essence - it is
impossible to say that He exists as an intermediary for a purpose
outside of Him. This dimension is paralleled by the Chanukah
candles. [42]
The Potential is Sufficient
As stated above, publicizing the Chanukah miracle is merely an
incidental factor, and is not the fundamental purpose of kindling
the Chanukah candles.
This concept is not refuted by the law which states that if a
person lights Chanukah candles in a place where they will not be
seen by others, e.g., higher than 20 cubits, [43] or at time when
they will not be seen by others, [44] he is not considered to
have fulfilled the mitzvah.
To explain:
The definition of the mitzvah of kindling Chanukah candles is
to light a lamp which provides light for people. [45]
A priori, this light should also be positioned in a place where
it publicizes the Chanukah miracle. There is, however, no binding
obligation that others actually see the Chanukah lights. All that
is necessary is that candles produce a light which can be seen by
others. [46]
To Reveal What Cannot Be Revealed
The inner rationale why there is an inherent motive for the
Chanukah candles to produce light which can be seen by everyone,
and which even attracts public notice, can be explained as
follows.
The highest levels of G-dliness, those which transcend the
natural order, even the essence of G-d Himself, as it were,
must be drawn down to this material realm. [47]
These levels of light transcend the limits of our material world.
Nevertheless, the ultimate intent is that they be drawn down in
a manner that will enable them to permeate also our material
frame of reference.
There is a parallel to this in our Divine service.
The fundamental intent of the power of mesirus nefesh which
reflects the essential bond between a Jew and G-d is not to serve
as an intermediary to arouse and illuminate our revealed powers
of intellect and emotion.
The fundamental purpose is the mesirus nefesh itself, and the
bond with G-d which is established through it. Nevertheless,
in the most complete sense, mesirus nefesh should also be openly
apparent, and should effect our revealed powers, spurring them to
deeper involvement in the Torah and its mitzvos.
For as explained in Tanya, [48] the observance of the Torah and
its mitzvos is dependent on mesirus nefesh. Nevertheless, even
when, Chas V'Shalom a person's mesirus nefesh does not have a
direct effect on his observance of the Torah and its mitzvos (as
it is possible that a Chanukah lamp will not provide light for
another person), there is nothing lacking in the mesirus nefesh
per se There is a lack in the person's revealed powers; they
are not sufficiently developed to be affected by the mesirus
nefesh. [49]
This lack does not detract from the person's mesirus nefesh.
The power of mesirus nefesh exists within all Jews as an inherent
potential, as our Sages state: [50] "A Jew, even though he sins,
remains a Jew." In this instance, however, the mesirus nefesh has
become an active force.
What Exile Cannot Obstruct
On the basis of the above, we can appreciate a unique factor
which distinguishes the Chanukah candles from all the other
mitzvos.
With regard to all the other mitzvos, there is a possibility that
a gentile will prevent a Jew from observing the mitzvos. Even
with regard to the three mitzvos concerning which it is stated:
[51] "You should die, rather than transgress," and a Jew is
obligated to sacrifice his life, a gentile's oppression can have
an effect.
Although the gentile cannot cause a Jew to nullify the observance
of these mitzvos, he can prevent the Jew from fulfilling them.
For if the Jew will remain firm in his observance and sacrifice
his life, he will be killed, and the mitzvos will no longer be
observed.
With regard to the mitzvah of Chanukah, by contrast, there is
no possible way that a gentile can negate its observance.
For as stated above, in an age when the gentiles try to prevent
the Jews from observing the mitzvah, it is sufficient to kindle
the Chanukah light[s] on one's dining room table. [52] A gentile
will not prevent him from doing that. [53]
This factor can be explained on the basis of the concepts stated
above.
The mitzvah of lighting Chanukah candles reflects the connection
of the essence of the soul with G-d's essence, a spiritual rung
which cannot be affected by sin. As such, exile which comes as
a result of sin (as we say in our prayers, [54] "Because of our
sins, we were exiled from our land") can have no effect upon this
mitzvah; no one can negate its observance.
A gentile can issue a decree preventing a Jew from kindling a
Chanukah light that shines outside his home; he cannot, however,
frustrate the essence of the mitzvah, for the candles can be
kindled within the home.
As the Ramban states, [55] "The candles of Chanukah will never
be nullified."
The concealment of G-dliness which characterizes exile, and in
a larger sense, our material existence as a whole, cannot prevent
their light from shining.
Adapted from the sichos of the 5th night of Chanukah,
Shabbos Parshas Mikeitz, and Zos Chanukah, 5720
Footnotes:
- (Back to text) Mishneh Torah, Hilchos Chanukah 4:14.
- (Back to text) Although the Rambam's words are quoted from the source
for this law in the Talmud (Shabbos 23b), he elaborates
on the connection between the two more than in the
original text.
- (Back to text) Shabbos 21b.
- (Back to text) Ibid.
- (Back to text) See Kehillas Yaakov (written by the author of Melo
HaRo'im), entry Tarmud. This concept, as are all the
elements of Pnimiyus HaTorah, is also reflected in the
teachings of Nigleh, the revealed realm of Torah law. As
evident from our Sages' statements (Yevamos 16b), there
were servants of King Shlomo who rebelled against him,
fled, and intermingled with the Tarmudites King Shlomo
"sat on the throne of G-d" (I Divrei HaYomim 29:23).
Thus a rebellion against him constituted rebellion
against G-d, as it were.
This also reflects the advantage of the lights of
Chanukah over the lights of the Menorah in the Beis
HaMikdash The revelation brought about by the Menorah's
lights did not nullify the existence of the Tarmudites.
On the contrary, they were partners in its destruction
(Jerusalem Talmud, Taanis 4:5).
The Chanukah lights, by contrast, cause the Tarmudites
to depart, i.e., they nullify their existence, even their
feet. The Chanukah candles eliminate all traces, even the
lowest levels, "the feet," of the approach of the denial
of G-d's authority symbolized by the Tarmudites.
- (Back to text) At the beginning of Parshas Behaaloscha.
- (Back to text) See Berachos 34b. See also Sefer HaMaamarim 5709, p. 183.
- (Back to text) Yoma 86b.
- (Back to text) See the Responsa of the Rashba, Vol. I, Responsum 9. See
also the maamar entitled Vayehi BaYom HaShemini, 5704,
where this concept is explained at length.
- (Back to text) Likkutei Torah, Devarim 92b, Shir HaShirim 50b.
- (Back to text) This concept also shares a connection to Parshas
Vayeishev as reflected in the teachings of the Maggid of
Mezeritch (Or HaTorah, at the beginning of Parshas
Vayeishev).
On the verse (Bereishis 37:1): "Yaakov settled in the
land where his father had sojourned, in the land of
Canaan," the Maggid focus on the fact that the word
megurei, translated as "sojourned," also means "fear of."
Thus the verse can be interpreted to mean that even
though Yaakov had settled in the land, in our material
world, he was still absorbed in the fear of his Father
in Heaven Although he lived in the land of Canaan,
among wicked people (as Hoshea 12:8 states: "Canaan, in
his hands are crooked scales"), he did not learn from
their actions.
(There is also a similar explanation in Torah Or, loc.
cit., focusing on the fact that the above verse mentions
the word "land" twice. The explanation in Torah Or,
however, speaks of a higher level, the sublime unity, and
the lower unity.)
The repetition of the word "land" refers to the
approaches of the righteous, and the baalei teshuvah.
Both are mentioned in the same verse, indicating a
connection between them.
- (Back to text) Erchin 13b; see also Likkutei Torah, Tazria 21d.
- (Back to text) See Tanya, Iggeres HaKodesh, the conclusion of Epistle 30.
- (Back to text) Cf. Megillah 29a.
- (Back to text) Yoma 2a; see also Shabbos 118b.
- (Back to text) See Yevamos 63a, commenting on Bereishis 2:20.
- (Back to text) See Shulchan Aruch HaRav 263:1 which explains that the
reason for kindling Shabbos candles is to establish
peace, so that one of the members of the family will not
trip over an article left on the floor accidentally, and
for this reason enter into strife with another family
member.
Similarly, lighting Shabbos candles is associated with
Oneg Shabbos, Shabbos pleasure. In particular, this
refers to the time when a person eats, for all of a
person's physical needs can be referred to with the term
"eating."
The explanation of the fusion of the opposite tendencies
of the man and his wife relates to the Rambam's
statements in Hilchos Chanukah, where as a reflection of
the greatness of peace, he cites the fact that "G-d's
Name is blotted out to establish peace between a husband
and his wife."
Similarly, the above explanations enable us to understand
why the Rambam refers to the Shabbos candles with the
term "a lamp for one's home," rather than refer to them
by name.
(Indeed, in the passage from Shabbos 23b, it is necessary
for Rashi to explain that the intent is Shabbos candles.)
For the importance of the Shabbos candles in this context
is the peace they establish within the home.
- (Back to text) Berachos 53a; Shulchan Aruch HaRav 298:17.
- (Back to text) Bamidbar 8:2.
- (Back to text) Shulchan Aruch (Orach Chayim 681:1). See the explanation
of this concept in Moadim B'Halachah, by R. S. Zevin.
- (Back to text) Shabbos 22b. See also the Sifra quoted by Tosafos.
- (Back to text) Ibid. 23b.
- (Back to text) The concept that the Chanukah candles were not intended
for a purpose other than their light cannot be disputed
because of the explanation given above that the Chanukah
candles generate peace (indeed a higher dimension of
peace than that generated by the Shabbos candles). Nor
can a question be raised from the fact that kindling the
Chanukah candles elevates the G-dly sparks enclothed in
the oil. These concepts, like the concept of publicizing
the Chanukah miracle, are incidental factors The
essential purpose of the Chanukah candles is solely for
their light; kindling them fulfills a self-contained
purpose.
- (Back to text) E.g., a person living alone who kindles them within his
home as will be explained.
- (Back to text) See Shulchan Aruch HaRav 263:10, and the sources cited
there.
- (Back to text) Shabbos, loc. cit.
- (Back to text) Ibid. 21b.
- (Back to text) I.e., an era when the gentiles attempted to stamp out the
observance of Chanukah. Before this time, Chanukah
candles were kindled at the entrance to one's home or
courtyard, and from this time onward, it became customary
to kindle the lights indoors.
- (Back to text) The Al HaNissim prayer, Siddur Tehillat HaShem, p. 59.
- (Back to text) There is, moreover, a foundation for such an approach
within the Torah itself. Bamidbar Rabbah (19:2) quotes
King Shlomo as saying: "I was able to comprehend all the
[other difficult passages in the Torah], but with regard
to the passage of the Red Heifer, I asked and I sought;
"I said, 'I will become wise,' but I [saw] that it was
far from me." And similarly, with regard to Moshe, the
Midrash (loc. cit.:6) states: "The Holy One, blessed be
He, told Moshe: 'To you [alone] will I reveal the
rationale for the Red Heifer.' "
- (Back to text) See HaYom Yom, entry Teves 2.
- (Back to text) Bamidbar Rabbah, at the beginning of Parshas Chukas; see
also the Rambam, Mishneh Torah, the conclusion of Hilchos
Mikveos.
- (Back to text) Shabbos 22b.
- (Back to text) Commentary of Pnei Yehoshua and Rosh Yosef to Shabbos
21b; Responsa Chacham Tzvi, ch. 87.
- (Back to text) See Tosafos, Sukkah 46a; Magen Avraham 676:1; the gloss
of the Tzaphnas Paneach to the Mishneh Torah, Hilchos
Chanukah 3:3.
- (Back to text) This concept is also reflected in the number of candles
lit: eight. For as explained above, the number eight is
associated with a transcendent dimension, Similarly, it
is reflected in the fact that it is the universal custom
to observe this mitzvah in the manner of mehadrin min
hamehadrin, in the most careful and beautiful manner. See
Likkutei Sichos, Vol. I, p. 92.
- (Back to text) Taanis 7b.
- (Back to text) Mishlei 6:23.
- (Back to text) Sifri, quoted by the Rambam at the conclusion of Hilchos
Chanukah. See also the maamar entitled Heichaltzu and its
explanation in Likkutei Torah. Note the interpretation
given for our Sages' statement (Sanhedrin 99b): "Whoever
occupies himself with the Torah for its own sake brings
about peace...."
- (Back to text) See Zohar, Vol. III, p. 73a. See also Tanya, chs. 5, 52,
and 53.
- (Back to text) See Tanya, ch. 23, and the notes of the Tzemach Tzedek to
that chapter.
- (Back to text) On this basis, it is possible to explain the statements
of the Ramban in the name of the Midrash in his
commentary at the beginning of Parshas Behaaloscha, which
mention that the lamps of the Menorah always point to the
center of the Menorah.
The Ramban explains that this passage refers to the
Chanukah candles, and as such, the question arises: What
is the connection of the Chanukah candles to the center
of the Menorah?
The Hebrew word translated as "center," pnei, also means
"inner dimensions." The Chanukah candles, which refer to
the Torah as it is united with G-d's essence, reflect
this inner light solely. See Tanya, Kuntres Acharon, the
essay beginning David Zemiros Keris lihu.
- (Back to text) Shabbos 22a; note Rashi's commentary. See also Rambam,
Mishneh Torah, Hilchos Chanukah 3:3, 4:12.
- (Back to text) See the conclusion of ch. 673 in the Beis Yosef, the
Maharshal, the Magen Avraham, the Chemed Moshe, and others.
- (Back to text) Similar to the Menorah which the Torah (Bamidbar 8:2)
states must "shine."
- (Back to text) To cite a parallel: With regard to the mixture of oil and
floor for the meal offerings, our Sages explain (Menachos
103b) that although the Torah states that they should be
mixed together, as long as they are fit to be mixed
together, the offering is acceptable even though in
actual fact, the flour and oil are not mixed together.
The concepts explained in the text above can be extended
to serve as the basis for the interpretation of the
difference of opinion between our Sages (Shabbos 21b) as
to whether it is permissible to derive benefit from the
Chanukah candles or not. The opinion which permits
deriving benefit from the Chanukah candles, maintains
that the light of the Chanukah candles, though
transcendent in nature, also has an effect and produces
benefits that can be appreciated within the natural order.
The opinion which maintains - and which is accepted as
halachah - that it is forbidden to benefit from the light
of the Chanukah candles operates under the conception
that the purpose of this light is not to effect change
with regard to our immediate, temporal concerns, for this
light transcends the natural order Even the changes
which it does effect in the world are separate from
ordinary worldly matters.
(Both of these concepts are reflected in the nature of
oil: On one hand, oil permeates through all objects.
Simultaneously, it does not become mixed with any other
liquid.)
Since this transcendent light does not enclothe itself
within the world and adapt itself to its limits, the
process of transmission to lower levels does not cause it
to undergo contraction or dimunation.
This can be connected to the Ramban's statements (in his
commentary to the beginning of Parshas Behaaloscha) that
the Chanukah candles and the priestly blessing will never
be nullified. For the Chanukah candles and the priestly
blessing share a common factor: They draw down a light
which transcends the natural order.
(This points to another connection between the two.
The commemoration of Chanukah in our prayers is through
the recitation of Hallel, and the addition of the prayer
Al HaNissim in the blessing Modim. The priestly blessing
is also recited after the blessing Modim. Moreover,
hode'ah, acknowledgment of G-d's kindness, is
thematically related to the two, because the transcendent
light which they convey cannot be grasped and
appreciated, all that we can do is to thankfully
acknowledge its influence.)
The transcendent light which the Chanukah candles and
the priestly blessing draw down does have an effect
within the world. Nevertheless, this effect is not
constrained within the limits of our world. On the
contrary, it follows the pattern of "His word runs most
swiftly" and is revealed in a transcendent manner
(Tehillim 147:15). (See Likkutei Torah, the conclusion of
Parshas Korach.)
- (Back to text) This transforms our world into a dwelling for G-d; see
Tanya, chs. 33 and 36.
- (Back to text) The conclusion of ch. 25.
- (Back to text) To cite an example of how a person's essential powers may
not effect his conscious self. Our Sages (Berachos 63a,
see Ein Yaakov,) say that a thief calls upon G-d before
breaking in to a home. On one hand, his power of faith is
aroused as reflected in his calling upon G-d.
Simultaneously, this arousal does not effect his revealed powers.
A similar concept can apply with regard to mesirus
nefesh. It is possible that a Jew who gives up his life
al kiddush HaShem, sanctifying G-d's Name, may be lax in
the observance of a particular mitzvah, for his revealed
powers have not been affected. {[Tanya (ch. 18) states
that even the most base and unrefined individuals are
prepared to sacrifice their lives al kiddush HaShem.
Inspite of their self-sacrifice, they] may remain base
and unrefined from the standpoint of their revealed
powers.} (See also Kuntres HaAvodah, ch. 5.)
- (Back to text) Sanhedrin 44a.
- (Back to text) Sanhedrin 74a; Shulchan Aruch, Yoreh De'ah 157a.
- (Back to text) Shabbos 21b.
- (Back to text) Trans. note: Even at times when gentiles would attempt
to stamp out the observance of the mitzvah of Chanukah
lights, one could fulfill the mitzvah (on its most basic
level) by lighting a single candle on the dining room
table. Nobody could object to a person sitting down to a candlelit meal.
- (Back to text) Musaf service for Festivals. Siddur Tehilat HaShem, p. 258.
- (Back to text) At the beginning of his commentary to Parshas
Behaaloscha. See the previous references to these statements.